Where gamma fails
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1071752
DOI10.1007/BF02429841zbMath0586.03016MaRDI QIDQ1071752
Robert K. Meyer, Steve Giambrone, Ross T. Brady
Publication date: 1984
Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items (15)
Belnap-Dunn Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer’s Logic B ⋮ EF4, EF4-M and EF4-Ł: A companion to BN4 and two modal four-valued systems without strong Łukasiewicz-type modal paradoxes ⋮ \(\mathbf R\) and relevance principle revisited ⋮ Paraconsistent constructive logic with strong negation as a contraction-free relevant logic ⋮ Disentangling \textsf{FDE}-based paraconsistent modal logics ⋮ A class of implicative expansions of Belnap-Dunn logic in which Boolean negation is definable ⋮ Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B ⋮ The \(\gamma \)-admissibility of relevant modal logics. I: The method of normal models ⋮ Completeness and conservative extension results for some Boolean relevant logics ⋮ A variant with the variable-sharing property of Brady's 4-valued implicative expansion BN4 of Anderson and Belnap's logic FDE ⋮ The lattice of Belnapian modal logics: Special extensions and counterparts ⋮ Relational semantics for the 4-valued relevant logics BN4 and E4 ⋮ Basic quasi-Boolean expansions of relevance logics ⋮ Strengthening Brady's paraconsistent 4-valued logic BN4 with truth-functional modal operators ⋮ How to be really contraction free
Cites Work
This page was built for publication: Where gamma fails
