Ranking alternatives - comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1095787
DOI10.1016/0377-2217(87)90273-6zbMath0632.90034OpenAlexW2147693796MaRDI QIDQ1095787
Publication date: 1987
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90273-6
Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Eigenvalues, singular values, and eigenvectors (15A18) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)
Related Items (10)
Transitive matrices, strict preference order and ordinal evaluation operators ⋮ Comparison of REMBRANDT system with analytic hierarchy process ⋮ EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF DERIVING PRIORITY VECTORS FROM RECIPROCAL PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES ⋮ A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices ⋮ Adjustment of importance weights in multiattribute value models by minimum discrimination information ⋮ Implementation of the centroid method of Solymosi and Dombi ⋮ Remarks on the Dyer-Saaty controversy ⋮ A weight-assessing method with habitual domains ⋮ Application of grey theory and multiobjective programming towards airline network design ⋮ A neural network technique in modeling multiple criteria multiple person decision making
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Inconsistency and rank preservation
- A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities
- Federations and transitive group choice
- A geometric averaging procedure for constructing supertransitive approximation to binary comparison matrices
- A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
- Exploring the interface between hierarchies, multiple objectives and fuzzy sets
This page was built for publication: Ranking alternatives - comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices
