Another proof of Stoll's theorem for moving targets
In 1929, Nevanlinna asked whether his defect relation remains valid for mutually distinct meromorphic target functions \(g_ 1,...,g_ q\) which grow more slowly than a given meromorphic function f on \({\mathbb{C}}\), that is, \(T(r,g_ j)=o(T(r,f))\) (r\(\to \infty)\), and he proved the conjecture for \(q=3\). In 1986, Steinmetz proved Nevanlinna's conjecture with an elegant short proof. On the other hand, in higher dimension, Stoll proved an analogous defect relation with a defect bound \(n(n+1)\) for holomorphic mappings of \({\mathbb{C}}\) into \({\mathbb{P}}^ n({\mathbb{C}})\) [see \textit{M. Stoll}, Math. Ann. 282, No.2, 185-222 (1988; Zbl 0629.30030)]. In this note, we give a short proof of Stoll's theorem.
- A General Second Main Theorem for Meromorphic Functions on C n
- An extension of the theorem of Steinmetz-Nevanlinna to holomorphic curves
- Eine Verallgemeinerung des zweiten Nevanlinnaschen Hauptsatzes.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3923118 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3785326 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3556405 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3032644 (Why is no real title available?)
- New defect relations for meromorphic functions on 𝐂ⁿ
- Remarks on holomorphic mappings
- The lemma of the logarithmic derivative in several complex variables
This page was built for publication: Another proof of Stoll's theorem for moving targets
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1121409)