The Perceptron algorithm versus Winnow: linear versus logarithmic mistake bounds when few input variables are relevant
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1127362
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3644821 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1306864 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3436645 (Why is no real title available?)
- A theory of the learnable
- Exponentiated gradient versus gradient descent for linear predictors
- How to use expert advice
- Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension
- On the Uniform Convergence of Relative Frequencies of Events to Their Probabilities
- On-line learning of linear functions
Cited in
(18)- PAC analogues of Perceptron and Winnow via boosting the margin
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2089358 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the perceptron learning algorithm on data with high precision
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2089359 (Why is no real title available?)
- Agnostic learning of geometric patterns
- General convergence results for linear discriminant updates
- Efficient learning with virtual threshold gates
- On approximating weighted sums with exponentially many terms
- Sequential correction of linear classifiers
- Learning DNF in time \(2^{\widetilde O(n^{1/3})}\)
- Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning
- 10.1162/1532443041424274
- Direct and indirect algorithms for on-line learning of disjunctions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1931830 (Why is no real title available?)
- Prototype Classification: Insights from Machine Learning
- Minimum generalization via reflection: A fast linear threshold learner
- Perceptron, Winnow, and PAC Learning
- Robust logics
This page was built for publication: The Perceptron algorithm versus Winnow: linear versus logarithmic mistake bounds when few input variables are relevant
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1127362)