Do sunspots matter when agents are Choquet-expected-utility maximizers?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1128525)
Recommendations
Cites work
- A Simple Axiomatization of Nonadditive Expected Utility
- Additive representations of non-additive measures and the Choquet integral
- Characterizing optimism amd pessimism directly through comonotonicity
- Economies with a Finite Set of Equilibria
- Extrinsic uncertainty revisited
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41674 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1154012 (Why is no real title available?)
- Indivisibilities, lotteries, and sunspot equilibria
- Intertemporal Asset Pricing under Knightian Uncertainty
- On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion
- Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
- The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
- Under stochastic dominance Choquet-expected utility and anticipated utility are identical
Cited in
(8)- Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility.
- Non-implementability of Arrow-Debreu equilibria by continuous trading under volatility uncertainty
- Interim efficiency with MEU-preferences
- A new approach to the rational expectations equilibrium: existence, optimality and incentive compatibility
- Monetary equilibria and Knightian uncertainty
- Agreeable bets with multiple priors
- Bilateral risk sharing with heterogeneous beliefs and exposure constraints
- Ambiguity aversion and trade
This page was built for publication: Do sunspots matter when agents are Choquet-expected-utility maximizers?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1128525)