Who betrayed Euclid? (Extract from a letter to the editor)

DOI10.1007/BF00328609MaRDI QIDQ1252011zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors André Weil

Publication date 1978

Published in Archive for History of Exact Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00328609

zbMATH Keywords

Betrayal to Euclid

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of Greek and Roman mathematics (01A20)

Cited in

(14)

• In defence of geometrical algebra
• The ancients and the moderns: Chasles on Euclid's lost \textit{porisms} and the pursuit of geometry
• Geometry and arithmetic in the medieval traditions of Euclid's \textit{Elements}: a view from Book II
• Origins and Application of Geometry in the Thera Prehistoric Civilization Ca. 1650 BC
• Theodorus’ proofs of incommensurabilities with Gnomons
• Situating the Debate on “Geometrical Algebra” within the Framework of Premodern Algebra
• Fermat's dilemma: Why did he keep mum on infinitesimals? and the European theological context
• Conceptual divergence -- canons and taboos -- and critique: reflections on explanatory categories
• What is ``geometric algebra, and what has it been in historiography?
• Introductory Remarks
• Abraham J. Sachs (1914--1983): in memoriam
• Linearity and Reflexivity in the Growth of Mathematical Knowledge
• Contextualizing Unguru’s 1975 Attack on the Historiography of Ancient Greek Mathematics
• Of our own nation: John Wallis's account of mathematical learning in medieval England

This page was built for publication: Who betrayed Euclid? (Extract from a letter to the editor)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1252011)