Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1996.0037zbMATH Open0908.90060OpenAlexW1978613335MaRDI QIDQ1267656FDOQ1267656

Authors: Brian Roe, Kevin J. Boyle, Mario F. Teisl 

Publication date: 13 October 1998

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0037

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2113767
• Current issues and a ‘wish list’ for conjoint analysis
• Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1264452

zbMATH Keywords

conjoint ratings dataestimates of Hicksian compensating variationstatistical significance of key variables

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Cited In (3)

• Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
• Compensating Variation and Hicksian Choice Probabilities in Random Utility Models that are Nonlinear in Income
• The case of conjoint analysis

This page was built for publication: Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1267656)