Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation

DOI10.1006/JEEM.1996.0037MaRDI QIDQ1267656zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors Brian Roe, Kevin J. Boyle, Mario F. Teisl

Publication date 13 October 1998

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0037

zbMATH Keywords

conjoint ratings dataestimates of Hicksian compensating variationstatistical significance of key variables

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2113767
• Current issues and a ‘wish list’ for conjoint analysis
• Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1264452

Cited in

(3)

• The case of conjoint analysis
• Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
• Compensating Variation and Hicksian Choice Probabilities in Random Utility Models that are Nonlinear in Income

This page was built for publication: Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1267656)