Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1288762

DOI10.1023/A:1007739018615zbMath0919.90010OpenAlexW2148364085MaRDI QIDQ1288762

Hein Fennema, M. A. L. M. van Assen

Publication date: 23 August 1999

Published in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007739018615




Related Items (23)

The influence of fear in decisions: experimental evidenceA parametric analysis of prospect theory's functionals for the general populationStability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theoryA further critique of cumulative prospect theory and related approachesCumulative prospect theory's functional menagerieStochastic dominance and mean-variance measures of profit and loss for business planning and investmentProspect theory in multiple price list experiments: further insights on behaviour in the loss domainOptimal lotteryRobust portfolio optimization with a generalized expected utility model under ambiguityA tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theoryReference-dependent utility with shifting reference points and incomplete preferencesThe Pearson system of utility functionsOn probabilities and loss aversionLoss aversion and perceptual risk aversionAn index of loss aversionError propagation in the elicitation of utility and probability weighting functionsA new axiomatization of rank-dependent expected utility with tradeoff consistency for equally likely outcomesEqual Tails: A Simple Method to Elicit Utility Under Violations of Expected UtilityReference-dependent expected utility with incomplete preferencesProbability weighting and the `level' and `spacing' of outcomes: an experimental study over lossesA unified derivation of classical subjective expected utility models through cardinal utilityLoss averse behaviorChoices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes






This page was built for publication: Measuring the utility of losses by means of the tradeoff method