Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparison to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1290232)
Recommendations
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty
- Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
- Effects of total cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open ended vs. dichotomous choice
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty: a comment
- Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation formats: An experimetnal study
Cited in
(10)- A general model of starting point bias in double-bounded dichotomous contingent valuation surveys
- Experimental methods and elicitation of values
- Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of contingent valuation models
- Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention
- Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty: a comment
- Discrete choice survey experiments: A comparison using flexible methods
- Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
- Rethinking the scope test as a criterion for validity in contingent valuation
- Strength-of-preference indicators and an ordered-response model for ordinarily dichotomous, discrete choice data
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: Design of an efficient and complete elicitation decision process in contingent valuation method
This page was built for publication: Elicitation effects in contingent valuation: Comparison to a multiple bounded discrete choice approach
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1290232)
