The epistemic virtues of consistency

DOI10.1007/BF00413765zbMATH Open0934.03009MaRDI QIDQ1292993FDOQ1292993

Authors: Sharon Ryan 

Publication date: 25 April 2000

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Recommendations

• Lotteries and justification
• Lotteries, knowledge, and inconsistent belief: why you know your ticket will lose
• Generalizing the Lottery Paradox
• The lottery: A paradox regained and resolved

zbMATH Keywords

lottery paradox

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Unified spin gauge theory of electroweak and gravitational interactions
• Interpolation and approximation of 3-D and 4-D scattered data

Cited In (12)

• You've come a long way, Bayesians
• The intensional structure of epistemic convictions
• Belief and certainty
• A bitter pill for closure
• Believing things unknown
• Lotteries and justification
• Knowledge, justification, and (a sort of) safe belief
• A geo-logical solution to the lottery paradox, with applications to conditional logic
• Minimalism and the generalisation problem: on Horwich's second solution
• Consistency, truth and ontology
• Lotteries, knowledge, and inconsistent belief: why you know your ticket will lose
• A defense of temperate epistemic transparency

This page was built for publication: The epistemic virtues of consistency

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1292993)