How the proof of Baudet's conjecture was found

DOI10.1007/S000170050045MaRDI QIDQ1296519zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors B. L. van der Waerden

Publication date 20 August 2001

Published in Elemente der Mathematik (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s000170050045

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Permutations, words, matrices (05A05) History of number theory (11-03) Arithmetic progressions (11B25)

Review text

Reprint of the 1965 article in [Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hamb. 28, 6-15 (1965; Zbl 0128.03702)]. Another version has been published before in [Elemente. Math. 9, 49-56 (1954; Zbl 0055.03802]). An English version appeared in [Studies Pure Math., Papers presented to Richard Rado (65th birthday), 251-260 (1971; Zbl 0241.05009)]. For the original proof of \textit{B. L. van der Waerden} see [Nieuw Arch. Wisk. 15, 212-216 (1927; JFM 53.0073.12)].

Recommendations

• How the upper bound conjecture was proved
• A proof of the Bieberbach conjecture
• A new proof of the Howe Conjecture
• A new proof to Bautin's theorem
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4089851
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7218
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 549093
• A simple proof of the Bieberbach conjecture

Cited in

(3)

• How the upper bound conjecture was proved
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1154600 (Why is no real title available?)
• SZEMERÉDI’S THEOREM: AN EXPLORATION OF IMPURITY, EXPLANATION, AND CONTENT

This page was built for publication: How the proof of Baudet's conjecture was found

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1296519)