On the difference between real and complex arrangements

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1319293

DOI10.1007/BF02571638zbMATH Open0789.57018arXivalg-geom/9202005OpenAlexW2142262686MaRDI QIDQ1319293FDOQ1319293


Authors: Günter M. Ziegler Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 June 1994

Published in: Mathematische Zeitschrift (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let B be an arrangement of linear complex hyperplanes in Cd. Then a classical result by Orlik & Solomon asserts that the cohomology algebra of the complement can be constructed from the combinatorial data that are given by the intersection lattice. If B is, more generally, a 2-arrangement in R2d (an arrangement of real subspaces of codimension 2 with even-dimensional intersections), then the intersection lattice still determines the cohomology {it groups} of the complement, as was shown by Goresky & MacPherson. We prove, however, that for 2-arrangements the cohomology {it algebra} is not determined by the intersection lattice. It encodes extra information on sign patterns, which can be computed from determinants of linear relations or, equivalently, from linking coefficients in the sense of knot theory. This also allows us (in the case d=2) to identify arrangements with the same lattice but different fundamental groups.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9202005




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (14)





This page was built for publication: On the difference between real and complex arrangements

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1319293)