Justification and defeat

DOI10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4zbMATH Open0807.68085OpenAlexW2118735566MaRDI QIDQ1329366FDOQ1329366

John L. Pollock

Publication date: 4 July 1994

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4

Recommendations

• How to reason defeasibly
• Publication:3493282
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1964822
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1301973

zbMATH Keywords

nonmonotonic reasoningdefault logic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• How to reason defeasibly
• A logic for default reasoning
• Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning
• Nonmonotonicity and the scope of reasoning
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (33)

• Victor vanquished
• Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis
• Pollock and Sturgeon on defeaters
• OSCAR
• Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack
• Cost-bounded argumentation
• A proof theoretic approach to qualitative probabilistic reasoning
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Abstract argumentation systems
• An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
• Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems
• Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning
• A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation
• CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION
• Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• On precise and correct qualitative probabilistic inference
• Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach
• Mathematical Arguments and Distributed Knowledge
• Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future
• Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
• Extending abstract argumentation systems theory
• Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report
• On the structure of rational acceptance: Comments on Hawthorne and Bovens
• Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
• A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks
• REWARD VERSUS RISK IN UNCERTAIN INFERENCE: THEOREMS AND SIMULATIONS
• Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
• The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis
• How to reason defeasibly
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation
• Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules

Uses Software

• OSCAR

This page was built for publication: Justification and defeat

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1329366)