Comparison of classical vs. inverse sampling for estimating plant cover using Monte Carlo simulations

DOI10.1016/0096-3003(94)90062-0MaRDI QIDQ1339773zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Robin M. Reich, Charles D. Bonham, Kimberly K. Remington

Publication date 8 December 1994

Published in Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(94)90062-0

zbMATH Keywords

Monte Carlo methodcensored samplesinverse sampling methodsample estimation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric estimation (62G05) Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Monte Carlo methods (65C05) Probabilistic methods, stochastic differential equations (65C99) Population dynamics (general) (92D25)

Recommendations

• Nonimitative estimates in Monte Carlo methods
• Sampling methods and parallelism into Monte Carlo simulation
• Monte Carlo approximations of the quantiles of a sample statistic
• Representativeness of a sample in Monte Carlo method
• Methods of reducing sample size in Monte Carlo computations

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3866350 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3673350 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3550043 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3224054 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3080959 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3103040 (Why is no real title available?)
• ON A METHOD OF ESTIMATING FREQUENCIES

This page was built for publication: Comparison of classical vs. inverse sampling for estimating plant cover using Monte Carlo simulations

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1339773)