Correction to A boundary link is trivial if the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of its complement is one

zbMATH Open0811.57023MaRDI QIDQ1343896FDOQ1343896

Kazushi Komatsu

Publication date: 1 May 1995

Published in: Osaka Journal of Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Lyusternik-Shnirel'man category of a space, topological complexity à la Farber, topological robotics (topological aspects) (55M30)

Cited In (1)

• A boundary link is trivial if the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of its complement is one

Recommendations

• Correction to: ``Seifert fibrations of lens spaces 👍 👎
• Correction to: ``Floer homology and splicing knot complements 👍 👎
• Correction to the article: A Floer homology for exact contact embeddings 👍 👎
• Lusternik-Schnirelmann category and knot complement. II 👍 👎
• On links whose complements have the Lusternik-Schnirelman category one 👍 👎
• Correction to the article ``An infinite-rank summand of topologically slice knots 👍 👎
• A geometric proof that boundary links are homotopically trivial 👍 👎
• A boundary link is trivial if the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of its complement is one 👍 👎
• Correction to: ``Kauffman type invariants for tied links 👍 👎
• Corrections to ``On the mapping theorem for Lusternik-Schnirelmann category 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Correction to A boundary link is trivial if the Lusternik-Schnirelmann category of its complement is one

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1343896)