Conditional obligation, deontic paradoxes, and the logic of agency

DOI10.1007/BF01531259zbMath0866.03010MaRDI QIDQ1353841

Paul Bartha

Publication date: 5 May 1997

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

paradoxesdeontic logicagencyconditional obligationsemantics of obligationstit-semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45) Other nonclassical logic (03B60)

Related Items (12)

Combinations of \textit{stit} with \textit{ought} and \textit{know} ⋮ Ten Problems of Deontic Logic and Normative Reasoning in Computer Science ⋮ In the realm of agents ⋮ The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation ⋮ On the basic logic ofSTITwith a single agent ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Deontic paradoxes in Mīmāṃsā logics: there and back again ⋮ A Logical Analysis of the Interaction between ‘Obligation-to-do’ and ‘Knowingly Doing’ ⋮ Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea ⋮ Uncompactness of stit logics containing generalized refref conditionals ⋮ A Complete STIT Logic for Knowledge and Action, and Some of Its Applications ⋮ Axioms for deliberative stit

Cites Work

• Indeterminist time and truth‐value gaps¹
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Conditional obligation, deontic paradoxes, and the logic of agency