Hidden lemmas in Euler's summation of the reciprocals of the squares
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1365472
DOI10.1007/BF00376450zbMath0879.01017WikidataQ124823141 ScholiaQ124823141MaRDI QIDQ1365472
Publication date: 19 January 1998
Published in: Archive for History of Exact Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
01A50: History of mathematics in the 18th century
11-02: Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to number theory
11-03: History of number theory
11-01: Introductory exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.) pertaining to number theory
Related Items
Developing into series and returning from series: A note on the foundations of eighteenth-century analysis, Differentials and differential coefficients in the Eulerian foundations of the calculus.
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- A proof that Euler missed: Evaluating \(\zeta\) (2) the easy way
- Hidden lemmas in a early history of infinite series
- Definite values of infinite sums: Aspects of the foundations of infinitesimal analysis around 1820
- Differentials, higher-order differentials and the derivative in the Leibnizian calculus
- On Euler's infinite product for the sine
- The correctness of Euler's method for the factorization of the sine function into an infinite product
- What Is Nonstandard Analysis?
- An Elementary Proof of the Formula \Sum ∞ k = 1 1/k 2 = π 2 /6
- A Direct Proof of Stirling's Formula
- Still Another Elementary Proof That Σ 1/k<sup>2</sup>=π<sup>2</sup>/6
- A Simple Proof of the Formula ∑ ∞ k = 1 = π 2 /6
- Another Elementary Proof of Euler's Formula for ζ(2n)
- Six Ways to Sum a Series
- Non-standard analysis
