Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation.

DOI10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00051-7MaRDI QIDQ1395601zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Paulo A. L. D. Nunes, Erik Schokkaert

Publication date 1 July 2003

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00051-7

zbMATH Keywords

Contingent valuationRecreationWarm glowWildlifeWillingness to pay

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Recommendations

• Some further implications of incorporating the warm glow of giving into welfare measures: A comment on the use of donation mechanisms by Champ et al
• Revealed preferences and aspirations in warm glow theory
• The scope trials: variation in sensitivity to scope and WTP with directionally bounded utility functions
• A competitive equilibrium for a warm-glow economy
• An experimental investigation of intrinsic motivations for giving

Cited in

(7)

• Some further implications of incorporating the warm glow of giving into welfare measures: A comment on the use of donation mechanisms by Champ et al
• The amenity value of the Italian climate
• Revealed preferences and aspirations in warm glow theory
• Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention
• The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study
• Animals and social welfare
• Risk perceptions and value of a statistical life for air pollution and traffic accidents: evidence from Bangkok, Thailand

This page was built for publication: Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1395601)