Hyperbolic manifolds are geodesically rigid

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1401478

DOI10.1007/s00222-002-0263-6zbMath1039.53046OpenAlexW1963614727MaRDI QIDQ1401478

Vladimir S. Matveev

Publication date: 17 August 2003

Published in: Inventiones Mathematicae (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-002-0263-6




Related Items (22)

Quantum integrability for the Beltrami-Laplace operators of projectively equivalent metrics of arbitrary signaturesAffine maps between CAT(0) spacesVolume and projective equivalence between Riemannian manifoldsTwo-dimensional metrics admitting precisely one projective vector fieldThe degree of mobility of Einstein metricsProjectively invariant objects and the index of the group of affine transformations in the group of projective transformationsOn the rigidity of magnetic systems with the same magnetic geodesicsTWO REMARKS ON PQε-PROJECTIVITY OF RIEMANNIAN METRICSThe geometry of symplectic pairsSplitting and gluing lemmas for geodesically equivalent pseudo-Riemannian metricsProof of the projective Lichnerowicz conjecture for pseudo-Riemannian metrics with degree of mobility greater than twoMetric projective geometry, BGG detour complexes and partially massless gauge theoriesNijenhuis geometryComplete Einstein metrics are geodesically rigidC-projective geometryNormal forms for pseudo-Riemannian 2-dimensional metrics whose geodesic flows admit integrals quadratic in momentaPseudo-Riemannian metrics on closed surfaces whose geodesic flows admit nontrivial integrals quadratic in momenta, and proof of the projective Obata conjecture for two-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian metricsVanishing of the entropy pseudonorm for certain integrable systemsSpaces with many affine functionsOpen problems and questions about geodesicsLocal normal forms for geodesically equivalent pseudo-Riemannian metricsLorentzian metrics null-projectively related to semi-Riemannian metrics




This page was built for publication: Hyperbolic manifolds are geodesically rigid