More on weighted servers or FIFO is better than LRU.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1426456
DOI10.1016/S0304-3975(03)00287-1zbMath1060.68143MaRDI QIDQ1426456
Rob van Stee, Csanád Imreh, Leah Epstein
Publication date: 14 March 2004
Published in: Theoretical Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Related Items (3)
The weighted 2-server problem ⋮ Paging with connections: FIFO strikes again ⋮ Calculating lower bounds for caching problems
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Competitive snoopy caching
- LRU is better than FIFO
- Competitive algorithms for the weighted server problem
- On-line file caching
- Trackless online algorithms for the server problem
- Limited bookmark randomized online algorithms for the paging problem
- Competitive algorithms for server problems
- Competitive Algorithms for Relaxed List Update and Multilevel Caching
This page was built for publication: More on weighted servers or FIFO is better than LRU.