Beyond recovery? A reply to Tennant. A critical discussion

DOI10.1023/A:1005495400861MaRDI QIDQ1583755zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Hans Rott, Sven Ove Hansson

Publication date 25 February 2001

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005495400861

zbMATH Keywords

belief revisionrecoveryphilosophy of sciencetheory change

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logics of knowledge and belief (including belief change) (03B42)

Recommendations

• Rejoinder: response to discussions and a look ahead
• Recoverability revisited
• A rejoinder to Hale's article
• Rejoinder to the discussion
• Recovery and epistemic residue
• Obstacles to bounded recovery.
• Rejoinder to the discussions
• Minimal change: relevance and recovery revisited

Cited in

(2)

• Still counterintuitive: a reply to Kremer
• How Not to Change the Theory of Theory Change: A Reply to Tennant

This page was built for publication: Beyond recovery? A reply to Tennant. A critical discussion

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1583755)