Light-cone gauge integrals: prescriptionlessness at two loops
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1587465
Abstract: The only calculations performed beyond one-loop level in the light-cone gauge make use of the Mandelstam-Leibbrandt (ML) prescription in order to circumvent the notorious gauge dependent poles. Recently we have shown that in the context of negative dimensional integration method (NDIM) such prescription can be altogether abandoned, at least in one-loop order calculations. We extend our approach, now studying two-loop integrals pertaining to two-point functions. While previous works on the subject present only divergent parts for the integrals, we show that our prescriptionless method gives the same results for them, besides finite parts for arbitrary exponents of propagators.
Recommendations
- Light-cone gauge integrals: Prescriptionlessness at two loops
- Loop integrals in three outstanding gauges: Feynman, light-cone, and Coulomb
- A POSSIBLE WAY TO RELATE THE "COVARIANTIZATION" AND THE NEGATIVE DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATION METHOD IN THE LIGHT-CONE GAUGE
- Probing negative-dimensional integration: Two-loop covariant vertex and one-loop light-cone integrals
- The Leibbrandt–Mandelstam prescription for general axial gauge one-loop integrals
Cited in
(8)- The Leibbrandt–Mandelstam prescription for general axial gauge one-loop integrals
- Two-loop anomalous dimension in light-cone gauge with Mandelstam-Leibbrandt prescription
- On the uniqueness of prescriptions for spurious poles in Feynman integrals
- MANDELSTAM–LEIBBRANDT: NOT REALLY A PRESCRIPTION IN THE LIGHT-CONE GAUGE
- Probing negative-dimensional integration: Two-loop covariant vertex and one-loop light-cone integrals
- Light-cone gauge integrals: Prescriptionlessness at two loops
- Loop integrals in three outstanding gauges: Feynman, light-cone, and Coulomb
- A POSSIBLE WAY TO RELATE THE "COVARIANTIZATION" AND THE NEGATIVE DIMENSIONAL INTEGRATION METHOD IN THE LIGHT-CONE GAUGE
This page was built for publication: Light-cone gauge integrals: prescriptionlessness at two loops
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1587465)