A note on the non-NP-hardness of approximate lattice problems under general Cook reductions.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1589481
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1335879
- Approximating the SVP to within a factor \((1+1/\dim^\varepsilon)\) is NP-hard under randomized reductions
- On the limits of nonapproximability of lattice problems
- Approximating CVP to within almost-polynomial factors is NP-hard
- Approximating \(SVP_{\infty}\) to within almost-polynomial factors is NP-hard
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4057011 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1256724 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1335879 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 512802 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1559544 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1775382 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1775383 (Why is no real title available?)
- A relation of primal--dual lattices and the complexity of shortest lattice vector problem
- Approximating CVP to within almost-polynomial factors is NP-hard
- Complexity Measures for Public-Key Cryptosystems
- Does co-NP have short interactive proofs ?
- Korkin-Zolotarev bases and successive minima of a lattice and its reciprocal lattice
- New bounds in some transference theorems in the geometry of numbers
- On the complexity of computing short linearly independent vectors and short bases in a lattice
- The complexity of promise problems with applications to public-key cryptography
- The hardness of approximate optima in lattices, codes, and systems of linear equations
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: A note on the non-NP-hardness of approximate lattice problems under general Cook reductions.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1589481)