Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions

DOI10.1307/MMJ/1030132191MaRDI QIDQ1590913zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Magnus Carlehed

Publication date 1 January 2001

Published in Michigan Mathematical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1030132191

zbMATH Keywords

Green functionplurisubharmonic functionspseudoconvex set

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Harmonic, subharmonic, superharmonic functions in higher dimensions (31B05) Plurisubharmonic functions and generalizations (32U05) Plurisubharmonic extremal functions, pluricomplex Green functions (32U35)

Recommendations

• Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions on convex domains of finite type
• The \(C^{1,1}\) regularity of the pluricomplex Green function
• The pluricomplex Green function on some regular pseudoconvex domains
• A relation between the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions in the unit ball of 𝐂ⁿ
• Comparison of the real and the complex Green functions, and sharp estimates of the Kobayashi distance

Cited in

(8)

• A relation between the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions in the unit ball of 𝐂ⁿ
• Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions on convex domains of finite type
• Potentials in pluripotential theory
• The pluricomplex Green function on some regular pseudoconvex domains
• A comparison principle for bounded plurisubharmonic functions on complex varieties in \(\mathbb C^n\)
• Quantitative estimates for the Green function and an application to the Bergman metric
• Some applications of projective logarithmic potentials
• Comparison of the real and the complex Green functions, and sharp estimates of the Kobayashi distance

This page was built for publication: Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1590913)