Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1590913
DOI10.1307/MMJ/1030132191zbMATH Open0960.32021OpenAlexW2072763452MaRDI QIDQ1590913FDOQ1590913
Authors: Magnus Carlehed
Publication date: 1 January 2001
Published in: Michigan Mathematical Journal (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1307/mmj/1030132191
Recommendations
- Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions on convex domains of finite type
- The \(C^{1,1}\) regularity of the pluricomplex Green function
- The pluricomplex Green function on some regular pseudoconvex domains
- A relation between the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions in the unit ball of 𝐂ⁿ
- Comparison of the real and the complex Green functions, and sharp estimates of the Kobayashi distance
Harmonic, subharmonic, superharmonic functions in higher dimensions (31B05) Plurisubharmonic functions and generalizations (32U05) Plurisubharmonic extremal functions, pluricomplex Green functions (32U35)
Cited In (8)
- A relation between the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions in the unit ball of 𝐂ⁿ
- Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions on convex domains of finite type
- The pluricomplex Green function on some regular pseudoconvex domains
- A comparison principle for bounded plurisubharmonic functions on complex varieties in \(\mathbb C^n\)
- Potentials in pluripotential theory
- Quantitative estimates for the Green function and an application to the Bergman metric
- Some applications of projective logarithmic potentials
- Comparison of the real and the complex Green functions, and sharp estimates of the Kobayashi distance
This page was built for publication: Comparison of the pluricomplex and the classical Green functions
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1590913)