Relativistic and non-relativistic studies of nuclear matter

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1609013

DOI10.1016/S0375-9474(02)01022-9zbMATH Open0997.81614arXivnucl-th/0101008MaRDI QIDQ1609013FDOQ1609013


Authors: Manoj K. Banerjee, John Tjon Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 14 August 2002

Published in: Nuclear Physics. A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Recently we showed that while the tensor force plays an important role in nuclear matter saturation in non-relativistic studies, it does not do so in relativistic studies. The reason behind this is the role of M*, the sum of nucleon mass and its attractive self-energy in nuclear matter. Yet nonrelativistic calculations at a certain level of approximation are far less difficult than comparative relativistic calculation. Naturally the question arises if one can modify a nonrelativistic method, say, the lowest order Brueckner theory (LOBT), to reproduce approximately the results of a relativistic calculation. While a many body effect, the role of M* is intrinsically relativistic. It cannot be simulated by adding multi-body forces in a nonrelativistic calculation. Instead, we examine if adding a set of recipes to LOBT can be useful for the purpose. We point out that the differences in the results arise principally from two reasons - first, the role of M* and second, the disappearance in a relativistic treatment of the gap in the hole and particle energy spectra, present in LOBT. In this paper we show that LOBT, modified by {it recipes} to remove these two reasons, generates results quite close to those of Dirac-Brueckner theory.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0101008




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Relativistic and non-relativistic studies of nuclear matter

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1609013)