Energy-based control of a distributed solar collector field

DOI10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00008-0MaRDI QIDQ1614366zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Publication date 5 September 2002

Published in Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-1098(02)00008-0

control of oil temperature control of solar collector fields distributed parameter systems energy-based control

Control/observation systems governed by partial differential equations (93C20) Application models in control theory (93C95)

Review text

The dynamics of the oil temperature \(T(t,x)\) along a tube of a distributed solar collector field are described by the energy balance given by the linear first-order PDE \[ A_0 \frac{\partial T(t,x)}{\partial t}+ q(t) \frac{\partial T(t,x)}{\partial x}= \frac{\eta_0 G_0}{c_0 \rho_0} \mu (x) I(t) \] with boundary condition \(T(t,0) = T_{in} (t)\), where \(A_0\) is the tube inner cross-sectional area in \(m^2\), \(q(t)\) is the oil pump volumetric flow rate, \(\eta_0\) is the collector optical efficiency, \(c_0\) is the specific oil heat capacity in \(J/K kg\), \(G_0\) is the collector aperture in \(m\), \(\rho_0\) is the oil mass density in \(kg/m^3\), \(\mu(x)\) is the tube/collector characteristic function of solar exposure, and \(I(t)\) is the solar radiation for \(0 \leq x \leq L\) and \(t \geq 0\) with tube length \(L > 0\) in \(m\). This model represents a simplified version as described in [\textit{Klein} et al. (1974); \textit{A. Orbach}, \textit{C. Rorres} and \textit{R. Fischl}, Automatica 17, 535-539 (1981; Zbl 0474.49007); \textit{L. Carotenuto}, \textit{M. LaCava} and \textit{R. Raiconi} [Int. J. Syst. Sci. 16, 885-900 (1985; Zbl 0568.93053); and \textit{E. Comacho} and \textit{M. Berenguel}, Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process. 11, 311-325 (1997; Zbl 0900.93233)]. Here the heat losses and the conductivity of the tube are neglected. The objective is to control the temperature \(T(t,L)\) to its specific setpoint depending on the control input of the oil pump flow rate \(q(t)\) with \( 0 < q_{\min} \leq q(t) \leq q_{\max} \) (\(q_{\min}\) safety limit, \(q_{\max}\) pump capacity limit). For this purpose, define the internal energy \[ U(t)= \int^L_0 c_0 T(t,x) \rho_0 A_0 dx . \] First, results on the convergence of \(U(t)\) and \(T(t,x)\) to \(U^*\) and \(T^*(x)\), respectively, as time \(t\) tends to \(+\infty\) are shown using the Laplace transform of the differential equation for \(U(t)\) and the Lyapunov functional \[ V(t)= \frac{1}{2} \int^L_0 [T(t,x)-T^*(x)]^2 dx . \] Second, the authors discuss implementation issues of the controller. Third, experimental results follow, indicating that the performance of the energy-based controller is similar to that of the best model-based controllers and better than some fine-tuning controllers. Thus, the energy-based controller for the internal energy of the solar power plant provides a conceptually simple, robust and highly performing nonlinear controller whose convergence is mathematically justified.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(16)

This page was built for publication: Energy-based control of a distributed solar collector field

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1614366)