Greedy can beat pure dynamic programming
DOI10.1016/J.IPL.2018.10.018zbMATH Open1469.68168arXiv1803.05380OpenAlexW2805855356WikidataQ129012801 ScholiaQ129012801MaRDI QIDQ1628699FDOQ1628699
Authors: Hannes Seiwert, Stasys Jukna
Publication date: 5 December 2018
Published in: Information Processing Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05380
Recommendations
Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science (68R10) Analysis of algorithms (68W40) Dynamic programming (90C39) Boolean programming (90C09)
Cites Work
- On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem
- Probability Inequalities for Sums of Bounded Random Variables
- On a routing problem
- A Dynamic Programming Approach to Sequencing Problems
- A Theorem on Boolean Matrices
- Random graphs.
- Finding optimum branchings
- Lower bounds for tropical circuits and dynamic programs
- Optimum branchings
- Negation can be exponentially powerful
- Some Exact Complexity Results for Straight-Line Computations over Semirings
- On the Parallel Evaluation of Multivariate Polynomials
- The tail of the hypergeometric distribution
- The steiner problem in graphs
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (5)
- Canonical greedy algorithms and dynamic programming
- ReLU neural networks of polynomial size for exact maximum flow computation
- Sorting can exponentially speed up pure dynamic programming
- Beating a Benchmark: Dynamic Programming May Not Be the Right Numerical Approach
- Approximation limitations of pure dynamic programming
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Greedy can beat pure dynamic programming
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1628699)