On the relative power of reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:1679901)
Abstract: We show that the two main reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity, p-projections and c-reductions, differ in power. We do so by showing unconditionally that there are polynomials that are VNP-complete under c-reductions but not under p-projections. We also show that the question of which polynomials are VNP-complete under which type of reductions depends on the underlying field.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3744549 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Dichotomy Theorem for Polynomial Evaluation
- A dichotomy theorem for homomorphism polynomials
- Algebraic complexity classes
- Completeness and reduction in algebraic complexity theory
- Homomorphism polynomials complete for VP
- Negation can be exponentially powerful
- Separation of NP-completeness notions
- The complexity theory companion
Cited in
(9)- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7561742 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1722667 (Why is no real title available?)
- A note on VNP-completeness and border complexity
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3936520 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4182020 (Why is no real title available?)
- Non-commutative arithmetic circuits: depth reduction and size lower bounds
- On the power of deterministic reductions to C=P
- Modified Redundant Representation for Designing Arithmetic Circuits with Small Complexity
- Schur polynomials do not have small formulas if the determinant does not
This page was built for publication: On the relative power of reduction notions in arithmetic circuit complexity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1679901)