A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation

DOI10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.006zbMath1423.68479MaRDI QIDQ1687271

Francesco Santini, Fabio Rossi, Stefano Bistarelli

Publication date: 22 December 2017

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2017.10.006

zbMATH Keywords

relaxation; semirings; abstract argumentation frameworks; inconsistency tolerance; weighted attacks

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

68T27: Logic in artificial intelligence

68T37: Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence

Related Items

On the Semantics of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Logic Programming Approach, Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation, Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees, Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view, Local Expansion Invariant Operators in Argumentation Semantics

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A Hasse diagram for weighted sceptical semantics with a unique-status grounded semantics
• A Relaxation of Internal Conflict and Defence in Weighted Argumentation Frameworks
• Coalitions of Arguments: An Approach with Constraint Programming
• A Common Computational Framework for Semiring-based Argumentation Systems
• Arguing with Valued Preference Relations
• A Comparative Test on the Enumeration of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation*
• Semiring-based constraint satisfaction and optimization
• Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
• From Argumentation Frameworks to Voting Systems and Back*
• Not only size, but also shape counts: abstract argumentation solvers are benchmark-sensitive
• Extending Social Abstract Argumentation with Votes on Attacks
• Inconsistency Tolerance