A note on hardness of diameter approximation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1705693

DOI10.1016/J.IPL.2017.12.010zbMATH Open1427.68106arXiv1705.02127OpenAlexW2613923799MaRDI QIDQ1705693FDOQ1705693


Authors: Karl Bringmann, Sebastian Krinninger Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 16 March 2018

Published in: Information Processing Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We revisit the hardness of approximating the diameter of a network. In the CONGEST model of distributed computing, ildeOmega(n) rounds are necessary to compute the diameter [Frischknecht et al. SODA'12], where ildeOmega(cdot) hides polylogarithmic factors. Abboud et al. [DISC 2016] extended this result to sparse graphs and, at a more fine-grained level, showed that, for any integer 1leqellleqoperatornamepolylog(n), distinguishing between networks of diameter 4ell+2 and 6ell+1 requires ildeOmega(n) rounds. We slightly tighten this result by showing that even distinguishing between diameter 2ell+1 and 3ell+1 requires ildeOmega(n) rounds. The reduction of Abboud et al. is inspired by recent conditional lower bounds in the RAM model, where the orthogonal vectors problem plays a pivotal role. In our new lower bound, we make the connection to orthogonal vectors explicit, leading to a conceptually more streamlined exposition.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02127




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (2)





This page was built for publication: A note on hardness of diameter approximation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1705693)