A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2017.12.008zbMATH Open1443.68175OpenAlexW2785021480WikidataQ110528587 ScholiaQ110528587MaRDI QIDQ1748533

Simon Parsons, Peter McBurney, Elizabeth I. Sklar, Andrea Cohen

Publication date: 11 May 2018

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/a-characterization-of-types-of-support-between-structured-arguments-and-their-relationship-with-support-in-abstract-argumentation(e5ffd163-3e91-4ee4-b3ff-e69ebd1cc21f).html

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationstructured argumentationabstract argumentationsupport relation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• How to reason defeasibly
• On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
• A general account of argumentation with preferences
• Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
• Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument
• A logic-based theory of deductive arguments
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
• An Algorithm for Computing Semi-stable Semantics
• On the Issue of Reinstatement in Argumentation
• Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty
• Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• DefLog: on the Logical Interpretation of Prima Facie Justified Assumptions
• Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
• Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding
• Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation
• Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief
• Backing and Undercutting in Defeasible Logic Programming

Cited In (3)

• Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
• Philosophical reflections on argument strength and gradual acceptability
• A probabilistic deontic argumentation framework

Uses Software

• OSCAR

Recommendations

• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations 👍 👎
• An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support 👍 👎
• An Axiomatic Approach to Support in Argumentation 👍 👎
• On relating abstract and structured probabilistic argumentation: a case study 👍 👎
• Intrinsic argument strength in structured argumentation: a principled approach 👍 👎
• On Supported Inference and Extension Selection in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1748533)