Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1750985

DOI10.1007/JHEP03(2018)151zbMATH Open1388.81675arXiv1801.08101OpenAlexW3106456612WikidataQ130051519 ScholiaQ130051519MaRDI QIDQ1750985FDOQ1750985


Authors: Daniel Kabat, Gilad Lifschytz Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 May 2018

Published in: Journal of High Energy Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Perturbative bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT starts by representing a free bulk field phi(0) as a smeared operator in the CFT. A series of 1/N corrections must be added to phi(0) to represent an interacting bulk field phi. These corrections have been determined in the literature from several points of view. Here we develop a new perspective. We show that correlation functions involving phi(0) suffer from ambiguities due to analytic continuation. As a result phi(0) fails to be a well-defined linear operator in the CFT. This means bulk reconstruction can be understood as a procedure for building up well-defined operators in the CFT which thereby singles out the interacting field phi. We further propose that the difficulty with defining phi(0) as a linear operator can be re-interpreted as a breakdown of associativity. Presumably phi(0) can only be corrected to become an associative operator in perturbation theory. This suggests that quantum mechanics in the bulk is only valid in perturbation theory around a semiclassical bulk geometry.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08101




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1750985)