Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1750985




Abstract: Perturbative bulk reconstruction in AdS/CFT starts by representing a free bulk field phi(0) as a smeared operator in the CFT. A series of 1/N corrections must be added to phi(0) to represent an interacting bulk field phi. These corrections have been determined in the literature from several points of view. Here we develop a new perspective. We show that correlation functions involving phi(0) suffer from ambiguities due to analytic continuation. As a result phi(0) fails to be a well-defined linear operator in the CFT. This means bulk reconstruction can be understood as a procedure for building up well-defined operators in the CFT which thereby singles out the interacting field phi. We further propose that the difficulty with defining phi(0) as a linear operator can be re-interpreted as a breakdown of associativity. Presumably phi(0) can only be corrected to become an associative operator in perturbation theory. This suggests that quantum mechanics in the bulk is only valid in perturbation theory around a semiclassical bulk geometry.









This page was built for publication: Does boundary quantum mechanics imply quantum mechanics in the bulk?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1750985)