What if you are not Bayesian? The consequences for decisions involving risk

DOI10.1016/J.EJOR.2017.09.027zbMATH Open1403.91112OpenAlexW2758482848MaRDI QIDQ1754080FDOQ1754080

Authors: Paul Goodwin, Dilek Önkal, Herman O. Stekler 

Publication date: 30 May 2018

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10454/13512

Recommendations

• Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies
• Non-Bayesian learning
• Belief revision generalized: a joint characterization of Bayes' and Jeffrey's rules
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3451179
• Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm

zbMATH Keywords

riskBayes' theoremdecision processesjudgmental biases

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10)

Cites Work

• Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
• Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations
• Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral Strategies
• Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights
• Individual and group decision making under risk: An experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance
• Updating subjective risks in the presence of conflicting information: an application to climate change
• Providing support for decisions based on time series information under conditions of asymmetric loss

Cited In (5)

• Optimal lot sentencing based on defective counts and prior acceptability
• Behavioral Decision Theory
• Individuals' estimates of the risks of death. II: New evidence
• The use of base rate information as a function of experienced consistency
• A Bayesian perspective on biases in risk perception

This page was built for publication: What if you are not Bayesian? The consequences for decisions involving risk

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1754080)