Non-crossing frameworks with non-crossing reciprocals

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1764166

DOI10.1007/S00454-004-1139-XzbMATH Open1062.05047arXivmath/0309156OpenAlexW3105785969MaRDI QIDQ1764166FDOQ1764166


Authors: David Orden, Günter Rote, Brigitte Servatius, Herman J. Servatius, Walter Whiteley, Francisco Santos Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 23 February 2005

Published in: Discrete \& Computational Geometry (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We study non-crossing frameworks in the plane for which the classical reciprocal on the dual graph is also non-crossing. We give a complete description of the self-stresses on non-crossing frameworks whose reciprocals are non-crossing, in terms of: the types of faces (only pseudo-triangles and pseudo-quadrangles are allowed); the sign patterns in the self-stress; and a geometric condition on the stress vectors at some of the vertices. As in other recent papers where the interplay of non-crossingness and rigidity of straight-line plane graphs is studied, pseudo-triangulations show up as objects of special interest. For example, it is known that all planar Laman circuits can be embedded as a pseudo-triangulation with one non-pointed vertex. We show that if such an embedding is sufficiently generic, then the reciprocal is non-crossing and again a pseudo-triangulation embedding of a planar Laman circuit. For a singular (i.e., non-generic) pseudo-triangulation embedding of a planar Laman circuit, the reciprocal is still non-crossing and a pseudo-triangulation, but its underlying graph may not be a Laman circuit. Moreover, all the pseudo-triangulations which admit a non-crossing reciprocal arise as the reciprocals of such, possibly singular, stresses on pseudo-triangulation embeddings of Laman circuits. All self-stresses on a planar graph correspond to liftings to piece-wise linear surfaces in 3-space. We prove characteristic geometric properties of the lifts of such non-crossing reciprocal pairs.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0309156




Recommendations





Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Non-crossing frameworks with non-crossing reciprocals

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1764166)