Revisiting Kneser's theorem for field extensions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1786045



Abstract: A Theorem of Hou, Leung and Xiang generalised Kneser's addition Theorem to field extensions. This theorem was known to be valid only in separable extensions, and it was a conjecture of Hou that it should be valid for all extensions. We give an alternative proof of the theorem that also holds in the non-separable case, thus solving Hou's conjecture. This result is a consequence of a strengthening of Hou et al.'s theorem that is a transposition to extension fields of an addition theorem of Balandraud.


For non-empty finite subsets \(S\) and \(T\) of an abelian group \(G\), define the sumset \(S+T\) by \(\{s+t\; :\; s\in S, \; t\in T\}\). Then, by the classical result of \textit{M. Kneser} [Math. Z 66, 88--110 (1956; Zbl 0073.01702)], \(| S+T| \geq| S| +| T| -1\) or there exists a subgroup \(H\neq \{0\}\) of \(G\) such that \(S+T+H=S+T\). \textit{X.-D. Hou, K. H. Leung, and Q. Xiang} [J. Number Theory 97, 1--9 (2002; Zbl 1034.11020)] generalized Kneser's theorem to field extensions in the following form. Let \(F\) be a field, \(L/F\) a field extension, and let \(S\) and \(T\) be finite dimensional subspaces of \(L\) over \(F\). Denote by \(ST\) the \(F\)-linear span of the set of products \(st, \; s\in S, \; t\in T\). Suppose that every algebraic element in \(L\) is separable over \(F\). Then \(\dim ST \geq \dim S + \dim T - 1\) or there exists a subfield \(K\), \(F \subsetneq K \subset L\), such that \(STK=ST\). \textit{X.-D. Hou} [Linear Algebra Appl. 426, 214--227 (2007; Zbl 1132.12003)] conjectured that the above assertion holds without the separability assumption. In the paper under review the authors prove Hou's conjecture by giving an alternative proof without the separability assumption, moreover, with \(K\) depending only on one of the factors. The result is a transposition to the extension field setting of a theorem of \textit{É. Balandraud} [Ann. Inst. Fourier 58, 915--943 (2008; Zbl 1143.11039)].











This page was built for publication: Revisiting Kneser's theorem for field extensions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1786045)