A Bayesian way to make stopping rules matter

DOI10.1023/A:1022034427230MaRDI QIDQ1811050zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Daniel Steel

Publication date 9 June 2003

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022034427230

zbMATH Keywords

Bayesian confirmation measuresstatistical inferencestopping rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Probability and inductive logic (03B48) Bayesian problems; characterization of Bayes procedures (62C10)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4072106
• Stopping rules as experimental design
• Persistent experimenters, stopping rules, and statistical inference
• Reasoning to a Foregone Conclusion
• Reference Priors When the Stopping Rule Depends on the Parameter of Interest

Cited in

(10)

• Stopping rules and the likelihood function
• Bayesian optimum stopping rule for software release
• Stopping rules as experimental design
• Confirmation as partial entailment: a representation theorem in inductive logic
• Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and relational confirmation
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4072106 (Why is no real title available?)
• Reasoning to a Foregone Conclusion
• Persistent experimenters, stopping rules, and statistical inference
• Bayesian stopping
• Bayesian confirmation theory and the likelihood principle

This page was built for publication: A Bayesian way to make stopping rules matter

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1811050)