A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses

DOI10.1023/A:1021538530673MaRDI QIDQ1811057zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Clark Glymour

Publication date 9 June 2003

Published in Erkenntnis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Philosophy of mathematics (00A30)

Recommendations

• A notion of \(C\)-justification for empirical statements
• \(\mathcal {HOTL}\): Hypotheses and observations testing logic
• The epistemic account of ceteris paribus conditions
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 611095
• Semantic generalizations for proving and disproving conjectures by analogy
• Pragmatic logics for hypotheses and evidence
• The categorical and the hypothetical: a critique of some fundamental assumptions of standard semantics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1746693
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} laws: Classification and deconstruction

Cited in

(8)

• The epistemic account of ceteris paribus conditions
• Do \textit{ceteris paribus} laws exist? A regularity-based best system analysis
• Ceteris paribus (,) logic helps
• \textit{Ceteris paribus} lost
• Ceteris paribus conditionals and comparative normalcy
• Realization, completers, and ceteris paribus laws in psychology
• Fodor v. Kripke: semantic dispositionalism, idealization and ceteris paribus clauses
• In favor of laws that are not \textit{ceteris paribus} after all

This page was built for publication: A semantics and methodology for \textit{ceteris paribus} hypotheses

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1811057)