Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning.

DOI10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00258-8zbMATH Open1043.68095OpenAlexW2049964007MaRDI QIDQ1852848

Gabriele Kern-Isberner, Marcelo A. Falappa, Guillermo R. Simari

Publication date: 21 January 2003

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(02)00258-8

zbMATH Keywords

Knowledge representationBelief revisionDefeasible reasoningChange theoryExplanations

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Knowledge representation (68T30)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Two modellings for theory change
• Belief contraction without recovery
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Abduction as belief revision
• Semi-revision
• A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.
• A logic for default reasoning
• Credibility limited revision
• Selective revision
• Defeasible Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach towards Defeasible Argumentation
• Counterfactuals

Cited In (24)

• On computing probabilistic abductive explanations
• Parallel belief revision: revising by sets of formulas
• Equivalence in argumentation frameworks with a claim-centric view: classical results with novel ingredients
• Prioritized and non-prioritized multiple change on belief bases
• Abduction in argumentation frameworks
• A computationally grounded logic of graded belief
• A quantitative approach to belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation
• Defeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A belief revision framework for revising epistemic states with partial epistemic states
• Belief revision in structured probabilistic argumentation, model and application to cyber security
• Dynamics of argumentation systems: a division-based method
• Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference
• Dialectical Explanations in Defeasible Argumentation
• Assertional Removed Sets Merging of DL-Lite Knowledge Bases
• Merging operators on stratified belief bases equipped with argumentative inference
• AGM 25 years. Twenty-five years of research in belief change
• Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison
• On the revision of informant credibility orders
• Dynamics of knowledge in D<scp>e</scp>LP through Argument Theory Change
• Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
• Explanation-friendly query answering under uncertainty
• Preferences and explanations

This page was built for publication: Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1852848)