Why fuzzy \(\mathcal T\)-equivalence relations do not resolve the Poincaré paradox, and related issues

DOI10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00244-0zbMath1020.03054MaRDI QIDQ1858408

Etienne E. Kerre, Martine De Cock

Publication date: 13 February 2003

Published in: Fuzzy Sets and Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

indistinguishabilityfuzzy equivalence relationPoincaré paradoxresemblance relationapproximate equalityfuzzy nearness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Theory of fuzzy sets, etc. (03E72) Reasoning under uncertainty in the context of artificial intelligence (68T37) Fuzzy sets and logic (in connection with information, communication, or circuits theory) (94D05)

Related Items (4)

Fuzzy region connection calculus: An interpretation based on closeness ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ INTERVAL-VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SETS AND SIMILARITY MEASURE ⋮ Building a class of fuzzy equivalence relations

Cites Work

• Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts
• Fuzzy modifiers based on fuzzy relations.
• On (un)suitable fuzzy relations to model approximate equality
• A note on approximate equality versus the Poincaré paradox
• On the relationship between \(T\)-transitivity and approximate equality
• Resemblance is a nearness
• Should fuzzy equality and similarity satisfy transitivity? Comments on the paper by M. De Cock and E. Kerre
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Why fuzzy \(\mathcal T\)-equivalence relations do not resolve the Poincaré paradox, and related issues