A note on the one-deviation property in extensive form games
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1864819
DOI10.1016/S0899-8256(02)00005-2zbMath1032.91026OpenAlexW2019516193MaRDI QIDQ1864819
Publication date: 23 March 2003
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-8256(02)00005-2
Related Items
Does backwards induction imply subgame perfection?, AGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. I: Definition and properties, On common belief in future rationality in games with ambiguous orderings of information sets, Belief change, rationality, and strategic reasoning in sequential games, Belief in the opponents' future rationality, Backward induction in games without perfect recall, Bayesian and consistent assessments, AGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. II: From PBE to sequential equilibrium, Exploring the gap between perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium, The algebraic geometry of perfect and sequential equilibrium: an extension, A model of minimal probabilistic belief revision
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games
- On rationalizability in extensive games
- The one-shot-deviation principle for sequential rationality
- Payoff information and self-confirming equilibrium
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection
- Rationalizable Strategic Behavior
- Sequential Equilibria
- Rationality, Nash Equilibrium and Backwards Induction in Perfect- Information Games
- Self-Confirming Equilibrium