Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats.

DOI10.1006/JEEM.2000.1185zbMATH Open1079.90521OpenAlexW2022803168MaRDI QIDQ1865337FDOQ1865337

Authors: J. R. DeShazo 

Publication date: 26 March 2003

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1185

Recommendations

• On visible choice sets and scope sensitivity.
• Inducing incentives to understate and to overstate willingness to pay within the open-ended and the dichotomous-choice elicitation formats: An experimetnal study
• Starting point bias in dichotomous choice valuation with follow-up questioning
• Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: Fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty
• Elicitation using multiple price list formats

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Queues and service in operations research (90B22)

Cited In (2)

• Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness
• A Test for Anchoring and Yea-Saying in Experimental Consumption Data

This page was built for publication: Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1865337)