Arbitration using the closest offer principle of arbitrator behavior.

DOI10.1016/S0165-4896(01)00085-3MaRDI QIDQ1867797zbMATH OpenOpenAlexDBLPWikidataFDO

Authors Michael J. Armstrong, W. J. Hurley

Publication date 2 April 2003

Published in Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4896(01)00085-3

zbMATH Keywords

ArbitrationGame theoryGroup decision and negotiation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• Final-Offer Arbitration
• Optimal arbitration
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1159415
• Alternating-offer games with final-offer arbitration
• Binding Versus Final-Offer Arbitration: A Combination is Best

Cites work

• An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
• Binding Versus Final-Offer Arbitration: A Combination is Best
• Double-offer arbitration
• Equilibrium Strategies for Final-Offer Arbitration: There is no Median Convergence
• Final-Offer Arbitration Under Incomplete Information

Cited in

(11)

• The burden of proof in a game of persuasion
• An amendment to final-offer arbitration.
• Alternating-offer games with final-offer arbitration
• An analysis of dual-issue final-offer arbitration
• Arbitration in business conflicts: a fuzzy decision model for arbitrated price agreements
• Binding Versus Final-Offer Arbitration: A Combination is Best
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1159415 (Why is no real title available?)
• Optimal arbitration
• The analysis of Nash equilibrium on final-offer arbitration model
• Nash meets Rubinstein in final-offer arbitration
• Bargaining outcomes with double-offer arbitration

This page was built for publication: Arbitration using the closest offer principle of arbitrator behavior.

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1867797)