Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks

DOI10.1023/A:1021603608656zbMATH Open1056.68589OpenAlexW1602796727MaRDI QIDQ1869617FDOQ1869617

Authors: Leila Amgoud, Claudette Cayrol 

Publication date: 28 April 2003

Published in: Journal of Automated Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656

Recommendations

• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
• Argumentative logics: Reasoning with classically inconsistent information

zbMATH Keywords

argumentationpreference relationshandling inconsistency

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Theory of languages and software systems (knowledge-based systems, expert systems, etc.) for artificial intelligence (68T35)

Cited In (56)

• Determining preferences over extensions: a cautious approach to preference-based argumentation frameworks
• A Persuasion Dialog for Gaining Access to Information
• Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation
• Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees
• Weighted argumentation for analysis of discussions in Twitter
• Sets of attacking arguments for inconsistent Datalog knowledge bases
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications
• Preference-Based Inconsistency Assessment in Multi-Context Systems
• t-DeLP: an argumentation-based temporal defeasible logic programming framework
• SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics
• Argumentation update in YALLA (yet another logic language for argumentation)
• Generating possible intentions with constrained argumentation systems
• A preferential framework for trivialization-resistant reasoning with inconsistent information
• On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
• A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
• Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
• A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks
• What can argumentation do for inconsistent ontology query answering?
• Sceptical and credulous approach to deductive argumentation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks
• Valued preference-based instantiation of argumentation frameworks with varied strength defeats
• Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation
• Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
• On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
• An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning
• Probabilistic argumentation
• Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
• Logic-based argumentation with existential rules
• An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• If nothing is accepted -- repairing argumentation frameworks
• A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments
• Towards an Extensible Argumentation System
• An argumentation system for reasoning with LPm
• Ensuring reference independence and cautious monotony in abstract argumentation
• Argumentation-based preference modelling with incomplete information
• Arguing and Explaining Classifications
• Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
• On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments
• A relaxation of internal conflict and defence in weighted argumentation frameworks
• Handling controversial arguments
• Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities
• Arguing with valued preference relations
• Integrating individual preferences into collective argumentation
• The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation
• Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses
• Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values
• Argumentation theory and decision aiding
• On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems
• Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
• Formalizing argumentative reasoning in a possibilistic logic programming setting with fuzzy unification
• Assessing the epistemological relevance of Dung-style argumentation theories

This page was built for publication: Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1869617)