A numerical comparison of two different approximations of the error in a meshless method

DOI10.1016/S0997-7538(02)01249-4zbMath1027.74074MaRDI QIDQ1870712

Luis Gavete, Antonio Ruiz, Jose Luis Cuesta

Publication date: 14 May 2003

Published in: European Journal of Mechanics. A. Solids (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

a posteriori error estimation; Meshless methods; Moving least squares

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

65N15: Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs

Related Items

A comparison of stress intensity factors obtained through crack closure integral and other approaches using extended element-free Galerkin method, On error control in the element-free Galerkin method, Adaptive simulation of two dimensional hyperbolic problems by collocated discrete least squares meshless method, Dual error indicators for the local boundary integral equation method in 2D potential problems, AN ERROR ESTIMATOR AND ADAPTIVITY BASED ON BASIS COEFFICIENT-VECTOR FIELD OF ELEMENT-FREE GALERKIN METHOD

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• An introduction to SPH
• Generalizing the finite element method: Diffuse approximation and diffuse elements
• On boundary conditions in the element-free Galerkin method
• A Petrov-Galerkin diffuse element method (PG DEM) and its comparison to EFG
• An \(h\)-\(p\) adaptive method using clouds
• Penalty functions in constrained variational principles for element-free Galerkin method
• A new implementation of the element free Galerkin method
• The finite difference method at arbitrary irregular grids and its application in applied mechanics
• Surfaces Generated by Moving Least Squares Methods
• Why Particle Methods Work
• Element‐free Galerkin methods
• A procedure for approximation of the error in the EFG method
• Reproducing kernel particle methods for structural dynamics
• An error indicator for the element-free Galerkin method.