A comparison of two systems of ordinal notations
DOI10.1007/S00153-003-0177-ZzbMATH Open1067.03063OpenAlexW2014501253MaRDI QIDQ1879003FDOQ1879003
Authors: Harold Simmons
Publication date: 22 September 2004
Published in: Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-003-0177-z
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1390279
- Wellfoundedness proofs by means of non-monotonic inductive definitions I: Π20-operators
- A Survey on Ordinal Notations Around the Bachmann–Howard Ordinal
- Fruitful and helpful ordinal functions
- Ordinal notations based on a hierarchy of inaccessible cardinals
normal functionsfixed pointsBachmann-Howard ordinalordinal notation systemsVeblen functioncritical ordinals\({\roman{ID}}_1\)ordinal notation systems from belowGödel's \(T\)
Proof theory in general (including proof-theoretic semantics) (03F03) Recursive ordinals and ordinal notations (03F15)
Cited In (10)
- Fruitful and helpful ordinal functions
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Ordinal arithmetic with simultaneously defined theta-functions
- How to compare Buchholz-style ordinal notation systems with Gordeev-style notation systems
- Ordinal vs cardinal status: two examples
- Constructive Ordinal Notation Systems
- Natural well-orderings
- A comparison of well-known ordinal notation systems for \(\varepsilon _{0}\)
- A simple relationship between Buchholz's new system of ordinal notations and Takeuti's system of ordinal diagrams
This page was built for publication: A comparison of two systems of ordinal notations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1879003)