Levi contractions and AGM contractions: A comparison

DOI10.1305/NDJFL/1040308830zbMATH Open0834.03009OpenAlexW2085431936MaRDI QIDQ1903580FDOQ1903580

Erik J. Olsson, Sven Ove Hansson

Publication date: 31 March 1996

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1040308830

Recommendations

• On having bad contractions, or: no room for recovery
• Semi-contraction: Axioms and construction
• On the logic of theory change: Contraction without recovery
• Specified meet contraction
• Theory contraction and base contraction unified

zbMATH Keywords

contractionbelief changerecoveryAGM

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other nonclassical logic (03B60)

Cites Work

• Belief contraction without recovery
• A survey of multiple contractions
• On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On the status of the postulate of recovery in the logic of theory change
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Measurement Theory
• Belief contraction in the context of the general theory of rational choice
• Two methods of constructing contractions and revisions of knowledge systems
• Changes of disjunctively closed bases

Cited In (9)

• Contraction: On the decision-theoretical origins of minimal change and entrenchment
• Belief contraction as nonmonotonic inference
• A representation result for value-based contraction
• Reversing the Levi identity
• Severe withdrawal (and recovery)
• How Infallible but Corrigible Full Belief Is Possible
• Systematic withdrawal
• Semi-contraction: Axioms and construction
• Recovery and epistemic residue

This page was built for publication: Levi contractions and AGM contractions: A comparison

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1903580)