On the equivalence of D and G-optimal designs in heteroscedastic models
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1907925
DOI10.1016/0167-7152(94)00236-1zbMath0839.62069OpenAlexW1972112233WikidataQ127673537 ScholiaQ127673537MaRDI QIDQ1907925
Publication date: 11 March 1996
Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7152(94)00236-1
information matrixlinear models\(D\)-optimalitydesign efficiencyhomoscedasticityheteroscedastic errorssupport pointsequivalence theoremsefficiency functionKiefer-Wolfowitz theorem\(G\)-optimal designscontinuous designs
Related Items
V-optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression ⋮ Locally \(D\)-optimal designs for heteroscedastic polynomial measurement error models ⋮ Various optimality criteria for the prediction of individual response curves ⋮ An algorithmic construction of optimal minimax designs for heteroscedastic linear models ⋮ Discussion: A general approach to \(D\)-optimal designs for weighted univariate polynomial regression models
Cites Work
- Minimal number of support points for mini-max optimal designs
- The Equivalence of Two Extremum Problems
- Duality of optimal designs for model discrimination and parameter estimation
- Convex design theory1
- A unified approach to the construction of minimax designs
- The design of experiments for discriminating between two rival models
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item