Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1914376
Recommendations
- Relevant implication and the weak deduction theorem
- Implicational Logic, Relevance, and Refutability
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4047689
- On a theory of weak implications
- The relevance of a relevantly assertable disjunction for material implication
- Inconsistency Tolerance
- On the logic of contingent relevant implication: A conceptual incoherence in the intuitive interpretation of R
- Logical Consequence Revisited
- Propositional logic extended with a pedagogically useful relevant implication
- Weak Logics with Strict Implication
Cited in
(15)- The difficulties in using weak relevant logics for naive set theory
- Comparing contents with information
- The number of logical values
- Curry's paradox, generalized modus ponens axiom and depth relevance
- Logic—The Big Picture
- Relevant implication and the weak deduction theorem
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 120341 (Why is no real title available?)
- FOUR BASIC LOGICAL ISSUES
- Generalizing the depth relevance condition: deep relevant logics not included in R-mingle
- The simple consistency of naive set theory using metavaluations
- Metavaluations
- Distribution in the logic of meaning containment and in quantum mechanics
- Sets as singularities in the intensional universe
- On a theory of weak implications
- Blocking the routes to triviality with depth relevance
This page was built for publication: Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1914376)