Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1914376
DOI10.1007/BF00247002zbMATH Open0873.03026MaRDI QIDQ1914376FDOQ1914376
Authors: Ross T. Brady 
Publication date: 26 October 1997
Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
- Relevant implication and the weak deduction theorem
- Implicational Logic, Relevance, and Refutability
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4047689
- On a theory of weak implications
- The relevance of a relevantly assertable disjunction for material implication
- Inconsistency Tolerance
- On the logic of contingent relevant implication: A conceptual incoherence in the intuitive interpretation of R
- Logical Consequence Revisited
- Propositional logic extended with a pedagogically useful relevant implication
- Weak Logics with Strict Implication
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47)
Cited In (14)
- Curry's paradox, generalized modus ponens axiom and depth relevance
- Logic—The Big Picture
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Relevant implication and the weak deduction theorem
- Distribution in the Logic of Meaning Containment and in Quantum Mechanics
- Comparing Contents with Information
- The Number of Logical Values
- FOUR BASIC LOGICAL ISSUES
- Generalizing the depth relevance condition: deep relevant logics not included in R-mingle
- The simple consistency of naive set theory using metavaluations
- Sets as singularities in the intensional universe
- On a theory of weak implications
- Blocking the routes to triviality with depth relevance
- METAVALUATIONS
This page was built for publication: Relevant implication and the case for a weaker logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1914376)
