The concept of relevance and the logic diagram tradition

DOI10.1007/S11787-010-0014-1zbMATH Open1255.03016OpenAlexW4211107765MaRDI QIDQ1931345FDOQ1931345

Authors: Jan Dejnožka 

Publication date: 25 January 2013

Published in: Logica Universalis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-010-0014-1

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4057477
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1354100
• Relevance Logic as a Conservative Extension of Classical Logic
• A new approach to classical relevance
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48206

zbMATH Keywords

modus ponensrelevant logicAristotlelogic diagramsentailmentBertrand RussellVenn diagramstruth tablesdisjunctive syllogismLudwig WittgensteinW. V. O. QuineAlan Ross AndersonCharles Ssanders PeirceGottlop FregeNuel D. Belnaptruth-grounds

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Substructural logics (including relevance, entailment, linear logic, Lambek calculus, BCK and BCI logics) (03B47)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Negation in relevant logics. (How I stopped worrying and learned to love the Routley star)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• CHR: a constructive relevant natural-deduction logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Creative and non-creative definitions in the calculus of probability
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Verisimilitude and content
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Philosophy and geometry. Theoretical and historical issues
• Aligning logical and psychological perspectives on diagrammatic reasoning
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Relevant implication
• On Entailment
• Modal translations in substructural logics
• Compatibility and relevance: Bolzano and Orlov
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Thinking with diagrams.
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Historical dictionary of logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The graphic-linguistic distinction
• Cognitive science approaches to understanding diagrammatic representations

Cited In (1)

• Relevance for the classical logician

Uses Software

• Hyperproof

This page was built for publication: The concept of relevance and the logic diagram tradition

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1931345)