The metaphysical nature of the non-adequacy claim. An epistemological analysis of the debate on probability in artificial intelligence

DOI10.1007/978-3-642-35359-8MaRDI QIDQ1931702zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Carlotta Piscopo

Publication date 15 January 2013

Published in Studies in Computational Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35359-8

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to computer science (68-02) General topics in artificial intelligence (68T01)

Recommendations

• The probability approach to the treatment of uncertainty in artificial intelligence and expert systems
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3982559
• Uncertain Inference
• Probability judgment in artificial intelligence and expert systems. With discussion
• The probabilistic foundations of rational learning

Cited in

(3)

• A glimpse at the metaphysics of Bongard problems
• Prometheus unbound or paradise regained: the concept of causality in the contemporary AI-data science debate
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3982559 (Why is no real title available?)

This page was built for publication: The metaphysical nature of the non-adequacy claim. An epistemological analysis of the debate on probability in artificial intelligence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1931702)